Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Assets (2)
And so we have statesmen with unbelievable assets and we only get to know about it one scandal at a time. We lament at how they are becoming rich while the country is poor, and conclude that the people whom we elected are crooks, but we have no way of proving it.
The main problem is that of accountability. And vigilance. The impeachment trial, though it has its flaws, is unprecedented in that for the first time, we are demanding an accountability from one of the highest seats of power. Finally, we are asking not why one is rich, but how one became so. But the Statements of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) is merely the beginning.
The main flaw of the SALN is that it doesn't paint a whole picture. Even coupled with the Income Tax Return (ITR), it doesn't say how one has earned, but merely how much one was taxed. If we want our leaders to give us a full accounting of how and how much they earned, then the way to do it is subject them to the rigors of Accounting.
Any partnership or corporation, for it to be considered a juridical entity, has to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Regardless if its equity is 100K or 100M, if you want your company to be legally recognized, then you have to register.
And once registered, you have to submit annual financial statements, that is: Balance Sheet, which states your assets, liabilities and net worth; Income Statement, which states your income sources and the expenses you've incurred; and Statement of Cash Flows, which states the movement of your cash. You also have your Notes to the Financial Statements which further clarifies the balances stated in the three reports.
All three reports are interconnected. The assets you have are used to create income, which in turn you use to pay up your liabilities and other expenses. These incomes and expenses are commonly in the form of cash, and thus reported as either an inflow or an outflow.
If corporations with net worth as little as a few hundred thousand pesos are required to submit Financial Statements, why not subject our leaders to the same rigor, considering some of them have assets and net worth amounting to hundreds of millions of pesos? And considering that amount of money they have amassed, it is not quite far-fetched that these people have their personal accountants trailing after them.
The financial statements, coupled with the ITR, can paint a bigger picture on the earnings and spending of our esteemed leaders. It will show us how much they are truly earning, and how much of that earnings are taxed. Furthermore, it will show us how and why their net worth are increasing. Because honestly, the government pays them measly change, yet they own cash accounts by the millions, which in my mind, truly does not equate.
The question now is how to impose such strict accounting guidelines to these esteemed statesmen when they can't even submit their liquidations on time. But that is another issue altogether.
photocredit
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Assets (1)
The biggest telenovela on air has is back for its second season and it's causing a stir, as expected. What with the revelations by the Ombudsman and the subsequent prayer to block it as evidence, the requests for inhibition, and the Senator-judges' request for CJ to testify falling on deaf ears, season 2 episode 1 of the Impeachment Drama did not fail to disappoint. Blame the politico's penchant for grandstanding; they should have let seasoned trial lawyers handle the prosecution. We wouldn't have seen them stammer and stutter their way to the proceedings, unable to counter all blocks and objections thrown every which way by the defense.
And now, we have the defense blocking everything with technicalities. They're blocking the evidences by the Ombudsman because the latter has no jurisdiction over the Chief Justice. They're insinuating that the Senator-judges are not impartial through their prayer of inhibition against one Senator whose son happens to be the Prosecution's spokesman. And they're blocking everybody's wish that the CJ testify because they cannot be forced to produce a witness who doesn't want to testify. Never mind the multiple pronouncements of the CJ himself that he will, in time, answer all allegations. I guess he's waiting for public consciousness to forget about it.
But there's one thing our esteemed statesmen may have missed. Public positions are held in public trust, and the normal rule of "innocent until proven guilty" does not apply. Winnie Monsod said it beautifully when she was grilling Mikey Arroyo over his assets a few years back. She schooled the poor thing masquerading as congressman that as a holder of public office, your innocence is not presumed; rather it should be established. And the CJ evading any and all queries about these alleged assets does not paint him an innocent. All his legal blocks, no matter how suave and sophisticated, merely cements to the public the perception that he is one of the biggest crooks in town.
To be continued...
photo credit
Sunday, April 19, 2009
The Circus Continues
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
My Day at the Bank
I went to the bank during my lunch break to make a deposit to Garfield's account, hoping to make short work of it.
The queue looked promising enough; there were five people in line, and three people in front of the counter. Not a bad number of customers. I took my place in the line, thinking of other things I can maybe do after my trasaction.
Ten minutes went by, and the same three people are still in front of the counter! This is getting suspicious. I craned my neck to see what they were doing, and it galled me to see that each of the three persons in front of the counter had at least ten items to transact with the teller! They've even spread the transaction slips on the counter for the tellers to sort out.
Precious minutes went by, and the same three people are still on the counter. Our queue of six doubled, and then tripled, and still, they're on the counter. My quiet excursion to the bank became a noisy one, as the customers in line grudgingly waited their turn.
At last, the three people completed their transaction, and the line started to move. I was in front of the counter for like two minutes; my total stay at the bank, 45 minutes. I've no more chance to do any other activity, for I'm needed back at the office. It was past 2 when I got back. I acted like nothing was amiss, and proceded with my after-lunch rituals.
I have nothing against people doing multiple transactions with the banks, and I have nothing against the tellers. In fairness to them, the tellers at that bank work briskly, unlike some other teller at some other bank I have the misfortune of transacting with. I just wish that they implement an "express" line where customers with sigle transactions can queue up, and not get caught up in the middle of limbo, watching the backs of corporate lackeys doing their stuff. Or maybe, the ones with multiple transactions should be the one having their special lane, so they wouldn't eat the precious minutes of those regular customers with just one or two transactions to deal with.
Whatever. I just needed to air that out.